« Six Pianos (1973). Steve Reich | Main | Bat Chain Puller (1976). Don Van Vliet »

October 19, 2005



Very interesting entry. I just wrote an entry on "Dr. Atomic" and the "Klinghoffer" film, but as soon as I posted, I found myself thinking about how I really have so little grasp of what makes me respond to art. I responded to the realism of Woolcock's film, you were alienated by it. On the other hand, I often find abstraction to be extremely powerful. Of course there is no such thing as pure abstraction or pure realism on stage (the things on the stage are always "real" to some degree, and the stage itself is always "unreal" to some degree), and examples of pure realism in film do not exist either (does pure abstraction? With the advent of computer animation, I'll have to think about that one). If I could only tease out just how the interplay of realistic and formalistic elements in art works to affect me, the observer, then I could...well, I don't know what I could do with such knowledge. It's probably more fun to keep questing and questioning...

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

/aworks data/

  • q2 streaming
  • aworks weekly listening
  • aworks recently played