India (1961). John Coltrane /the story of a sound/
I'm reading Coltrane: The Story of a Sound by Ben Ratliff. The first half of the book was dazzling; a cogent description of how Coltrane's music developed and evolved during his career. The second half is more complicated and tries to make sense of the influence he and his music had on others.
The book has lots of interesting writing. The first thing that struck me was, following a description of how Coltrane was clearly trying to be something beyond entertaining and yet not be deliberately provocative, was this passage:
His position was not antisocial. There is no question that Coltrane's intent was generosity, and that he wasn't interested in the shocking-diversion aspect of modernity, or even particularly art for its own sake. I have searched through his written and spoken comments and unless I'm mistaken, Coltrane never used the word "art" on the record.
Then via Sound and Space, Richard Taruskin writes a book review castigating Julian Johnson's Who Needs Classical Music? Cultural Choice and Musical Value:
The primary assertion, made on the first page of Johnson's introduction and reiterated endlessly thereafter, is that classical music is uniquely distinguished by "its claim to function as art, as opposed to entertainment." The whole book is an elaboration of this categorical, invidious, didactically italicized, and altogether untenable distinction, the purpose of which is to cancel the claims of consumers on the prerogatives of producers.
Here's India from Live at the Village Vanguard including Eric Dolphy on bass clarinet and Ahmed Abdul-Malik on oud. I've listened to it five times this evening and haven't even gotten to such "hits" as Chasin' the Trane, Naima, and Greensleeves.


Recent Comments