I don't really have time to post these days but I found a link that deserves a quote longer than del.icio.us allows:
There was NO SINGING in Nixon in China. Seriously! There was chanting,
there were what sounded like random notes thrown together, the kind of
stuff that makes me think that the composer John Adams closed his eyes
and started marking notes on blank sheet music with one hand tied
behind his back. Then he gave that to the orchestra and to the singers
and said, "Here's my Opera. Good luck, yo." It hurt to sit there. So
how can it even be called an opera with no music to speak of?
Is this a recycled review circa Philip Glass' Einstein on the Beach? And if that really was John Adams' compositional process, I personally think it sounds better than one would expect. But more importantly,
I should probably ponder my current take on the music of the composer since it had never occurred to me that Adams' take on minimalism is inherently unmusical. In a perverse way, I find it refreshing to hear that attack on this opera.
Still, I happen to be listening to the works of Earle Brown this week so I can respect the idea that some compositions could be inherently unmusical (although even with Mr. Brown, that may not actually be true).
Of course, I also look forward to SF Opera's production of Einstein on the Beach in some yet to be announced season. Maybe we'll get to see people picketing outside the opera...
current political listening: live senate debate on cspan2 re: allowing a vote on the levin/reed amendment, as of at 11:16pm pdt. harkin actually gave a good speech presumably reflecting the views of iowans but the two senators that followed (republican and democratic, for the record) were grating. by the way, california senator barbara boxer is presiding madame president tonight and as an unexpected side comment, she acknowledged the fine civic (center) blogging of sfmike. ok, not really.
Recent Comments