Orbits (1979). Henry Brant
That interview several weeks ago with Bill Lueth, the KDFC program director had me reeling:
For stations of any format, the game is the same. "In commercial radio," Lueth says, "you have to have a certain level of popularity in order to survive." KDFC needs to be inclusive, he says, "to get as many people to come to the party as possible. Over the years, we've got 200,000 new listeners, and the demographics are better -- we have more younger listeners. But, sadly, we leave maybe 10,000 classical music fans at the table."
The article implies 600,000 or so listeners tune in to KDFC. Just to see if I am really part of the 10,000 rather than the 600,000, I've been listening to the station again for the first time in awhile. No contemporary music obviously nor did they play any American composers while I was listening. I did learn that I don't much care for the music of Boccherini. And, I'm surprised at the number of lesser European composers from the 1700s and 1800s that I had never heard of. I'm also astonished I heard absolutely no music I ever need to hear again. For example, lately I've been enjoying MP3s of Handel's organ concertos. But of all the baroque music KDFC played, nothing was of any interest. Nothing.
All of which is the point, I guess. KDFC provides classical music with no effort required on the listener's part. No need for a musical education, no need to have any prior musical experience, no need to judge for one's self what music is worthy let alone challenging, no need to even note works that merit future investigation -- just turn it on and let it soothe.
There's always the "it leads to the 'real stuff'" argument. At age fourteen, my listening to Chick Corea and Weather Report did in fact result in, at age sixteen, hearing John Coltrane and Dexter Gordon. But, I suspect that KDFC's lifestyle music doesn't generate that kind of progression for most of their listeners. Several years ago, I bought a KDFC sampler CD as a Christmas gift for a KDFC listener I know. But in hindsight, that was probably superfluous. You don't listen to the station because you care about any particular piece; you listen because of the predictability. Hey, I can respect that.
But for me, I need some time with say, Music Mavericks' Crunchy Channel. First up, it's Henry Brant's Orbits which sounds thrilling in comparison.



Yeah, a lot of crap (if you'll pardon me for saying so) gets played on my local classical station. Lots of 18th and early 19th century music, although in the evening they broadcast concerts by major out-of-town orchestras and they play some more modern music. I'm not holding my breath for an all-Stockhausen concert, but it at least mixes up the sounds a little. And, yes, at age 15, my listening to early '70s Keith Jarrett opened doors to both Ornette Coleman and Bill Evans (and, eventually, to Cecil Taylor, Karlheinz Stockhausen, and everyone else).
Posted by: Michael McNeill | March 19, 2005 at 06:45 PM
How, exactly, is this different from any radio station? No, seriously, it sounds just like your other typical commercial stations.That's just the way things are in the radio world, unless you're lucky enough to live in an area where the college radio station has good jazz, postclassical, or something similar on the air. Other than that, internet radio is the way to go. If I think about the crud put out on our local classical station, then I enjoy my local college radio even more. Free form mixing of Riley, Glass, ambient, Radiohead, and more seems far more interesting than some mediocre baroque output. Sigh.
Posted by: rothko | March 20, 2005 at 10:34 AM
The state of "classical" or art music on the radio in this country is just plain awful. So I've given up entirely and removed the FM tuner from my system, replacing it with a spare iMac and a DSL connection. We listen to internet radio all the time. E.g. BBC Radio 3. And on Live365 there are many many personal feeds. The best for contemporary music are Kyle Gann's PostClassic Radio http://www.live365.com/stations/kylegann
and Robin Cox's Iridian Radio http://www.live365.com/stations/iridianradio. Both can be accessed via iTunes or any mp3 stream player.
It is sad because when I grew up in the 50's in NYC we had many extremely fine classical stations. I learned all I needed to know about classical music from the radio. (I never got into pop music... none of it made sense to me.)
And then the leap from Varese (who I first heard on WNYC in 1959!) to Coltrane, Mingus, and Ornette, was easy.
Orchestras and opera companies complain today that they have no audience for new music. Maybe if they played some they might develop an audience. KDFC is an abomination. We sometimes leave it on a portable radio to entertain our parrots when we're gone. I'm waiting for one of them to mimic Diane Nicolini. THe announcing on KDFC is a farce. Worse than a Monty Python skit.
But then again, I'm happy to announce that I'm back on the radio myself, after a 10 year absence from KPFA (I did new music programs on KPFA/Berkeley from 1969-1995).
You can hear my Music From Other Minds on KALW 91.7 every Friday night at 11pm. http://rchrd.com/mfom/ for details.
Thank you, KALW!
Posted by: Richard Friedman | March 20, 2005 at 03:21 PM
I also wish KDFC would play more contemporary music. Sometimes they'll play some Copeland or Britten, etc. (which is good) but I never hear anything from the Viennese school or Bartok or Stravinsky and certainly not Varese. I've voiced my gripe with KDFC to them before, and their response was that if they played that sort of stuff they wouldn't remain competitive in the commerical radio market, which is unfortunate. I'll contiue to listen to them, however, because when it comes to classical music radio in the Bay Area, they're the only game in town--and Beethoven, Brahms, etc., are still worth listening to. Unfortunatly, their ads make them sound like they're serving up longhair Muzak for stressed out yuppies who need to mellow out after a day of multitasking. Frankly though, Los Angeles has a listener supported classical station (KUSC) which incudes a lot of challenging modern music as well as other classical dials, and Sacramento has one as well. I wouldn't be surprised if the reason why we only have KDFC here is because the Bay Area isn't the mecca of culture it makes itself out to be. LA has more cultural resources than SF, but people here love to smugly put LA down as a cultural wasteland. It's no surprise that "Phantom of the Opera" was such an enormous hit up here.
Posted by: | November 20, 2007 at 04:41 PM